Jewish Banking

and

Financial Manipulations


Capitalism is a Jewish stronghold, whilst banking throughout the world and throughout history has always had a high Jewish involvement.

(The following is an extract from "Jews and Money: the Myths and the Reality" by Gerald Krefetz, himself a Jew.):

The five Rothschild brothers who had banks in Frankfurt, London, Paris, Vienna and Naples, Eleichroder in Berlin, Warburg in Hamburg, Oppenheim in COlogne and Speyer in Frankfurt, individual Jews founded banks from London (Hambros ) to Bombay (Sassoons ) to Petersburg ( Guenzburg ) and a number of points in between.

Besides these personal or private banks, roughly equivalent to merchant banks or investment banks today, Jews helped to establish a number of important stock banks or commercial banks: the Deutsche Bank and the Dresdner Bank ; two of Germany's big three ; the French Credit Mobilier, and the Bank de Paris et des Pays Bas, the Italian Banca Comerciale italiana, and Credito Italiano, the Creditan-Stalt-Bankverein and Banque de Bruxelles amongst others.

There were a few Jewish bankers in the United States : Haym Salomon of revolutionary fame and Isaac Moses who, with Alexander Hamilton, was one of the founders of the Bank of New York in 1784. It was not until the German/Jewish immigration of the 1840s that the presence of Jewish bankers was felt in America.

Some of the established German Banks sent representatives but for the most part the German/Jewish bankers rose from the ranks only after they arrived.

Between 1840 and 1880 a dozen banking houses were started: Bache; Auguste Belmont; Goldman, Sachs; J. W. Seligman; Kuhn, Loeb; Ladenburg, Thalmann; Lazard Frères; Lehman Brothers; Speyer; and Wertheim.

Influential, but unorthodox, in financial matters and inbred like the Rothschilds, their children married each other. Jewish bankers projected an image of concentrated power because they often acted in concert, collaborating on financial deals.

This collection of Jewish bankers and banks in both Europe and America convinced many people that the Jews were out to dominate and control the world.

At the height of nationalistic resurgence in the 19th century, the Rothschilds were developing international syndicates, a form of international banking. In twentieth century America Jewish businessmen were developing investment banking expertise to finance consumer-oriented businesses. department stores, Alaskan fisheries, movies, theatres, copper mining and smelting, airlines and clothing factories.

In the 1960s Jews were again in the forefront in creating a new business form - the conglomerate, a multi-purpose holding company whose disparate profit centres were purely synergistic, greater than the sum of its component parts. It was not a Jewish invention, that probably belongs to Roy Little of Textron, but Lehman Brothers, Lazard Frères, and Goldman Sachs were forcible in selling the new notion.

Besides the self-interest of these investment banking houses, mergers and acquisitions generated volumes of new corporate issues that Wall Street underwrote, sold and traded.

Besides the investors in conglomerate shares and debentures, the people who had the most to lose were the staid managements of the victim companies, for the most part the take-over candidates were old industrial companies with secure, if unexciting, markets, substantial assets with little debt, under-utilised capital, high dividends, diverse ownership and no immediate growth prospects.

The conglomerate era of the sixties, abetted by a high-flying stock market and a prolonged boom was really a non-too subtle attack on established corporations.

Though the accounting was devious and the newly issued paper of dubious value, the conglomerate posed a substantial threat to the corporate status quo. By the late sixties the stalwarts of American industry and finance such as Chemical Bank, Goodrich, Great American Insurance, Jones & Laughlin and Pan American were under the gun, and naturally in the spirit of free enterprise they ran to the government for protection.

James Ling of Ling-Temco-Vaught, Roy Ashe of Littom and Roy Little of Textron were joined by Ben Heineman of North-West Industry, Howard Newman of Philadelphia and Reading, Saul Steinberg of Leasco, Charles Bludhorn of Gulf and Western, Riklas of Rapid American, Lawrence Tish of Loess, each practising the highest form of "creative" Capitalism. These Jewish conglomerate builders, from the flamboyant to the conservative, spearheaded the attack, aided by clever investment bankers, a permissive Democratic president and a credulous public. They shook up old managements, created anomalous corporations and provided Wall Street with the strength of dazzling investment vehicles.

Just about everyone suffered grieviously when reality in the form of recession and a strict Republican administration returned in the 1970s.

The old establishment was Republican whilst the Jewish investment bankers and conglomerate builders were strongly represented in the Democratic party. The Nixon administration immediately directed the Justice Department Anti-Trust Division against what had been called "the Jewish-cowboy" connection, i.e. the Wall Street financiers and Texas oil men.

The "Jewish-cowboy" connection contained some oil companies: Amerada-Hess, Tidewater, Kerr-McGee, Halliburton, airlines: American, Braniff, Continental, Movies: Paramount, Twentieth-Century Fox and Metro Goldwyn-Meyer, and, best of all consumer goods and merchandising: Sears, Jewel Tear, Gimbel's, Macy's, City Stores, Allied Department Stores.

The Nixon attack cut the conglomerates to the quick . The Stock Market reappraised their values. Within the first couple of months of the new adminstration 13 conglomerates lost 5 billion. It marked the end of an era, and the Jews emerged relatively unscathed.


It is worthy of comment that hitherto the Jews have played the "undercover game", right from Jakob Fugger in the early sixteenth century, acting surreptiously mainly through agents with the Freemasons their principal conduit. Is this advertising of their perfidity now a sign of acknowledgment of guilt or is it bravado?


There is a Zionist dominance in the British economy, names like Goldsmith, Clore, Wolfson, Joseph, Bentley and Maxwell all of whom implemented the breakdown of long-established English companies to their own gain causing thereby a loss of employment for many workers.

"The plan I think is the old one of world dominion in a new form ... The money power and the revolutionary power have been set up and given sham but symbolic shapes, (Capitalism or Communism) and sharply defined citadels (America and Russia). Such is the spectacle publicly staged for the masses, but what if similar men with a common aim secretly rule in both camps and propose to achieve their ambition through the clash between those masses? I believe that any diligent student of our times will discover that this is the case." (Douglas Reed.)

The Bible defines usury as an abomination but it is also defined as a means of gaining power over others.

"And thou shalt lend unto many nations but thou shalt not borrow. And thou shalt reign over many nations but they shall not reign over thee." Deuteronomy 15:16
and
"Thou shalt lend to many nations and thou shalt not borrow and the Lord shall make thee the head and not the tail, and thou shalt be above only and thou shalt not be beneath." Deuteronomy 28.12

This is the Levitical priesthood speaking not the God of the New Testament.

Far worse than usury on money already in existence is "fiat"-money, money created out of nothing nearly always as interest-bearing debt.

"The main mark of modern government is that we do not know who governs de facto any more than de jure . We see the politician and not his backer, still less the backer of the backer or, what is most important of all, the banker of the backer, throned about all in a manner without parallel in all the past is the veiled prophet of finance, swaying all men living by a sort of magic." (G. K. Chesterton.)

Cultural subversion is massively encouraged by the Media of the money establishment the most degraded drug-sodden artists are held up as models to be admired and emulated by the young. (Kate Moss, Britney Spears and Madonna.)

Western Super-capitalism lives in constant dread of nationalism and thus also of monarchies. An all important factor, with a binding and directing influence on all the other components of the twentieth-century world revolution, is that of Zionism, which can be described as a geographically dispersed, but intensely united and passionately motivated Jewish nationalism.

Paradoxically the Jewish people have come to the fore as a dominant influence in world affairs at a time when most Jews attach little or no importance to a religion which for close on two millenia was a powerful binding force.

There is only one political weapon that Super Capitalism can use against nationalism and that is a communist ideology that marshals the forces of the underworld and of rootless intellectualism holding them ready to be aimed like a battering ram against any nationalist target.

The World Revolution can thus be described as a struggle in which one powerful nation is bent on the overthrow of all other nations.

The brilliant and penetrating words of authors Christian de Brie and Jean de Maillard explain the actual world economic and political situation.

"By allowing capital to flow unchecked from one end of the world to the other, globalisation and the abandon of sovereignity have together fostered the explosive growth of an outlaws' financial market. It is a coherent system closely linked to the expansion of modern capitalism and is based on the association of three partners : governments, trans-national corporations,and the Mafias.

Business is business. Financial crime is first and foremost a market, thriving and structured, ruled by supply and demand. Big business complicity plus political laissez-faire is the only way that large- scale organised crime can launder and re-cycle the fabulous proceeds of its activities and the trans-nationals need the support of governments and the neutrality of regulatory authorities in order to consolidate their position, increase their profits, withstand the competition, pull off the deal of the century and finance their illicit operations.

Politicians are directly involved. Their ability to intervene depends upon the backing and the funding of the people in power. This collusion of interest is an essential part of the world economy, the oil that keeps the wheels of capitalism turning."